The Senior TPS Advisor ‘Sensei’ – Knowledge Transfer and Mentorship in the Toyota Production System

Lean TPS shop floor before and after 5S Thinking showing visual stability that enables problem detection and problem solving

In the Toyota Production System, a Sensei is more than a teacher. A Sensei is the living link between experience and application, the person who ensures knowledge is not lost between generations. For me, that person was Mr. Sadao “Sam” Nomura, Senior Advisor for Toyota Industries Corporation.

When Mr. Nomura visited BT Raymond in Brantford, Ontario, he did not give lectures. He observed. He walked the floor, looked at flow, asked questions, and wrote down his observations on small sheets of paper. We called them Nomura-Grams. Each note described a real condition, a visible fact that required leadership action.

He expected improvement to be hands-on and immediate. At the end of every visit, his notes were transferred to A3-sized sheets so that the lessons could be studied and shared. Each A3 became a record of mentorship. Nomura used these to teach leadership, accountability, and problem solving in a structured, measurable way.

One of those A3s, Nomura-Gram #31, remains one of my most valued lessons. During that visit, he asked for a copy of the Lean TPS training material that I had developed. He said it represented the right balance of theory and Gemba practice. His gesture was not about praise. It was about responsibility. He wanted proof that our learning could continue after he left.

Nomura’s mentorship always focused on the connection between people and process. He said that true TPS could only exist when leaders developed people who could see, understand, and solve problems on their own. The Sensei’s role was to build that capability, not to give answers. His method was quiet, consistent, and direct.

He taught that knowledge transfer is not a classroom exercise. It is the act of leaders working beside others, confirming facts, and demonstrating discipline. When a Sensei teaches, they expect the student to teach others. That is how TPS continues.

Nomura’s presence reminded us that improvement and learning are the same thing. Every observation was a lesson. Every correction was an opportunity to develop people. His approach showed that a Sensei’s greatest contribution is not the system they improve, but the people they leave capable of improving it further.

That is how the Toyota Production System preserves its strength. It is not through books or charts, but through mentorship that makes knowledge visible and transferable. Mr. Nomura embodied that role, and his influence continues to guide how I teach Lean TPS today.

Lean TPS House diagram showing Just In Time, Jidoka, Heijunka, Standardized Work, and Kaizen positioned within the Toyota Production System architecture
This Lean TPS Basic Training visual explains how Kaizen operates within the governed architecture of the Toyota Production System. Just In Time and Jidoka function as structural pillars, Heijunka and Standardized Work provide stability, and Kaizen strengthens the system only when standards and control are in place. The image reinforces
Lean TPS Swiss Cheese Model showing how governance failures propagate from organizational systems to gemba outcomes, and how TPS prevents conflicts that Theory of Constraints resolves downstream.
Theory of Constraints manages conflict after instability forms. Lean TPS prevents conflict through governance of demand, capacity, and Quality before execution begins.
Takahama Line 2 Andon board showing real time production status and Quality control in the Toyota Production System
Dashboards and scorecards increase visibility, but they do not govern work. In Lean TPS, Andon exists to control abnormality in real time by enforcing stop authority, response timing, and leadership obligation to protect Quality.
Lean TPS Disruptive SWOT transforms traditional SWOT from a static listing exercise into a governed leadership system. Through Survey, Prioritize, and Action, it aligns strategic direction with Quality, system stability, and explicit leadership obligation within a Lean TPS governance framework.
Balance scale showing Respect for People and Continuous Improvement grounded in Quality governance within Lean TPS.
In Lean TPS, Respect for People and Continuous Improvement are not independent goals. Both emerge from Quality governance, where leaders define normal work, make abnormality visible, and respond to protect system stability.
Lean TPS shop floor before and after 5S Thinking showing visual stability that enables problem detection and problem solving
5S Thinking is not about making the workplace look clean or impressive. In Lean TPS, it functions as a visual reset that restores the ability to see normal versus abnormal conditions. When the environment is stabilized, problems surface quickly, Quality risks are exposed earlier, and problem solving becomes possible at