A Lean TPS Assembly Line Example: Manpower and Capacity Planning

Assembly line of forklifts in production, representing manpower and capacity planning in a Lean TPS environment.
A practical example of manpower and capacity planning using Lean TPS. Learn how Toyota’s approach balances efficiency, utilization, and workload to meet demand without overburdening people or processes.

Reclaiming Toyota Production System: My Lean TPS Basic Thinking

Meeting production demand requires more than adding labor. It requires structured capacity planning grounded in Lean TPS principles. Toyota’s approach integrates manpower balance, standard work, and takt alignment to ensure production meets customer demand efficiently without overburdening people or processes.

This example demonstrates how to calculate manpower requirements, assess capacity, and balance workloads using Lean TPS logic.


Step 1: Determining Manpower Requirements

A work center is tasked with producing 500 forklifts per week, each requiring 15 minutes of labor. The total weekly labor demand is:

500 units × 15 minutes = 7,500 minutes (125 hours).

The work center operates 40 hours per week at 80% utilization and 110% efficiency. The rated capacity per assembler is therefore:

40 × 0.8 × 1.1 = 35.2 available hours per assembler.

To determine manpower:
125 total hours ÷ 35.2 available hours = 3.55 assemblers.
Since partial assignments are not possible, 4 assemblers are required to meet demand.

This ensures production stability without excessive overtime or underutilization.


Step 2: Assessing Actual Production Capacity

Once manpower is assigned, the next step is to evaluate the true production capacity.

4 assemblers × 40 hours per week = 160 total hours.
Applying utilization and efficiency:
160 × 0.8 × 1.1 = 140.8 available hours.

Converting to minutes:
140.8 × 60 = 8,448 minutes.

Each unit requires 15 minutes, so actual output capacity is:
8,448 ÷ 15 = 563 units per week.

This capacity exceeds the 500-unit requirement, providing flexibility to handle variation, rework, or unplanned downtime.


Step 3: Balancing the Work Center Load

Manpower planning is only part of the equation. Lean TPS emphasizes balance across all work centers to eliminate unevenness (Mura) and overburden (Muri).

Example – Weekly Load by Product Type

  • Model A: Setup 3 hours, run time 2 hours per piece.
  • Model B: Setup 5 hours, run time 1 hour per piece.

A three-week workload review reveals:

  • Week 1 = 43 hours (3 hours over capacity)
  • Week 2 = 38 hours (2 hours under capacity)
  • Week 3 = 41 hours (1 hour over capacity)

Total = 122 hours, or 2 hours over capacity.

By identifying these imbalances, production planning can redistribute work, adjust setups, or improve sequence planning to maintain flow.


Step 4: Applying Lean TPS Thinking

Toyota’s manpower and capacity planning process is more than arithmetic. It is a visual, data-driven system that supports stability, flow, and people development. The focus is to:

  • Balance workloads across shifts and lines.
  • Maintain flexibility without creating excess labor.
  • Improve methods before increasing manpower.
  • Use Standardized Work to stabilize repetitive tasks.

The result is a system that meets customer demand while preventing overproduction, underutilization, and burnout.

Lean TPS ensures that capacity planning supports both performance and respect for people. It aligns manpower, process capability, and continuous improvement into one consistent management system.

Introduction Artificial intelligence and humanoid robotics are entering production, logistics, and service environments faster than most organizations are prepared for. Many companies are searching for frameworks to manage this shift, but the structure they need has existed inside Toyota for nearly a century. The Toyota Production System is the only

What Mr. Ohno and Dr. Shingo would think of modern Lean interpretations
A Lean TPS visual showing what Mr. Ohno and Dr. Shingo emphasized: TPS as a complete system based on Jidoka, Kaizen, scientific thinking, and learning by doing.
Lean TPS Jishuken case study visual showing production kaizen results at a Takahama supplier, including 30 percent man-hour reduction and leadership engagement through Lean TPS Basic Training.
A Takahama Jishuken case study showing how supplier performance improved by 30 percent through structured leadership engagement and Lean TPS thinking.
Visual representing the evolution of the Toyota Production System and Lean TPS from Kaizen and Jishuken foundations.
Lean TPS connects Toyota’s industrial legacy to modern continuous improvement through reflection, Jidoka, and leadership development at the Gemba.
Visual showing Toyota leaders Mr. Sadao Nomura, Mr. Seiji Sakata, and Mr. Susumu Toyoda reviewing Lean TPS Basic Training at Toyota BT Raymond.
TPS Basic Thinking continues the tradition of Toyota Production System learning, emphasizing reflection, abnormality response, and waste elimination through structured training.
Visual showing Just In Time and Jidoka pillars from Lean TPS Basic Training with focus on lead time reduction and abnormality response.
Lean TPS Basic Training teaches how Just In Time and Jidoka work together to prevent failure, reduce stagnation, and build capability in people through the Toyota Production System.