Kaizen TPS for Lean Success: Linking Toyota’s 5S Thinking to Ford’s CANDO System

Lean TPS 6S Thinking diagram showing the evolution from Ford’s CANDO system to Toyota’s 5S and Safety model for continuous improvement.
Toyota’s 5S Thinking originated from Ford’s CANDO system of Clean, Arrange, Neatness, Discipline, and Ongoing improvement. By adapting these principles into 5S and later adding Safety, Toyota created a complete system for structure, discipline, and respect. Lean TPS 6S Thinking connects efficiency with human care, making continuous improvement sustainable.

The foundation of Toyota’s 5S Thinking began long before the term “Lean” was ever used. In the early 20th century, Henry Ford’s CANDO system Clean, Arrange, Neatness, Discipline, and Ongoing improvement set the stage for modern production methods. Ford understood that order and discipline were not management slogans but prerequisites for quality and flow.

Toyota engineers studying Ford’s approach in the 1930s took those ideas and restructured them into a system that could be taught, practiced, and sustained. What began as CANDO evolved into Toyota’s 5S Thinking: Sort (Seiri), Set in Order (Seiton), Shine (Seiso), Standardize (Seiketsu), and Sustain (Shitsuke). Each step became more than a housekeeping activity. It became a disciplined method to reveal waste, expose problems, and stabilize work.

The first three S’s Sort, Set in Order, and Shine address physical order and cleanliness. They make abnormality visible and build pride in the workplace. The last two S’s Standardize and Sustain create consistency and discipline. Together they transform daily work into a learning system where structure supports continuous improvement.

Over time, Toyota expanded this system by introducing a sixth S: Safety. Safety was not an addition for compliance. It represented the company’s Respect for People philosophy. True safety in Lean TPS is built through design and structure. A clean, organized, and standardized environment naturally prevents accidents and creates stability for workers. The formula 3S + 2S + 1S = 6S became a simple way to communicate this balance between efficiency, discipline, and care.

In Lean TPS 6S Thinking, safety and improvement are inseparable. A workplace that is unsafe cannot be efficient. A process that is disorganized cannot be improved. 5S Thinking builds the structure; Safety ensures that structure protects people. Together, they create the conditions for Kaizen to thrive.

At Toyota, Kaizen was never a separate event. It was a daily discipline built on the foundation of 5S and Safety. Each improvement began by seeing what was abnormal, questioning why, and taking action to correct it. 5S Thinking made the workplace a classroom. Kaizen made it a laboratory for learning.

Ford’s CANDO system gave industry the first model of structured improvement. Toyota’s 5S Thinking transformed that model into a culture of continuous learning. Lean TPS 6S Thinking carries that legacy forward. It is how organizations sustain quality, efficiency, and safety through structure and discipline.

In Lean TPS, every improvement begins with a clean, organized, and safe workplace. It is the physical expression of Respect for People and the first real step toward continuous improvement.

Lean TPS House diagram showing Just In Time, Jidoka, Heijunka, Standardized Work, and Kaizen positioned within the Toyota Production System architecture
This Lean TPS Basic Training visual explains how Kaizen operates within the governed architecture of the Toyota Production System. Just In Time and Jidoka function as structural pillars, Heijunka and Standardized Work provide stability, and Kaizen strengthens the system only when standards and control are in place. The image reinforces
Lean TPS Swiss Cheese Model showing how governance failures propagate from organizational systems to gemba outcomes, and how TPS prevents conflicts that Theory of Constraints resolves downstream.
Theory of Constraints manages conflict after instability forms. Lean TPS prevents conflict through governance of demand, capacity, and Quality before execution begins.
Takahama Line 2 Andon board showing real time production status and Quality control in the Toyota Production System
Dashboards and scorecards increase visibility, but they do not govern work. In Lean TPS, Andon exists to control abnormality in real time by enforcing stop authority, response timing, and leadership obligation to protect Quality.
Lean TPS Disruptive SWOT transforms traditional SWOT from a static listing exercise into a governed leadership system. Through Survey, Prioritize, and Action, it aligns strategic direction with Quality, system stability, and explicit leadership obligation within a Lean TPS governance framework.
Balance scale showing Respect for People and Continuous Improvement grounded in Quality governance within Lean TPS.
In Lean TPS, Respect for People and Continuous Improvement are not independent goals. Both emerge from Quality governance, where leaders define normal work, make abnormality visible, and respond to protect system stability.
Lean TPS shop floor before and after 5S Thinking showing visual stability that enables problem detection and problem solving
5S Thinking is not about making the workplace look clean or impressive. In Lean TPS, it functions as a visual reset that restores the ability to see normal versus abnormal conditions. When the environment is stabilized, problems surface quickly, Quality risks are exposed earlier, and problem solving becomes possible at