The Cost of Poor Quality: A Hidden Opportunity for Improvement

Lean TPS Basic Thinking visual illustrating Cost of Poor Quality categories and links between warranty claims, defect costs, and design problems.
The Cost of Poor Quality reveals hidden losses in processes. Lean TPS uses prevention, standardization, and leadership engagement to eliminate waste and build capability.

The Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) represents the hidden losses that occur when processes fail to produce right the first time. It measures the total cost associated with defects, inefficiencies, and waste across the entire product or service lifecycle.

These losses are often underestimated because they are distributed across multiple departments design, production, logistics, and customer service. However, when quantified, COPQ reveals the true cost of instability, waste, and poor process control.

Understanding the Cost Categories

Lean TPS divides COPQ into three primary categories. Each reflects how variation and waste affect overall performance.

1. Quality Problems in the Market (External Failure Costs)

When customers experience defects, the cost extends beyond immediate repairs. External failure costs damage both profitability and reputation.

Examples include:

  • Warranty Claims: Costs for repairs, replacements, and service under warranty.
  • Returned Goods: Freight, logistics, and administrative expenses tied to returns.
  • Customer Service Costs: Troubleshooting, complaint handling, and field support.
  • Brand and Trust Loss: Reduced customer loyalty and long-term revenue impact.

Every external failure represents a missed opportunity for prevention. In Toyota’s system, customer complaints are not treated as service issues but as valuable data for process improvement.

2. Design Quality Problems (Internal Failure Costs)

Design-related errors create waste before products reach production. They result from unclear specifications, lack of cross-functional collaboration, or weak verification processes.

Examples include:

  • Engineering Change Orders: Cost of redesigning components or correcting errors.
  • Design Mistakes: Incomplete or inaccurate drawings that require rework.
  • Testing and Validation Costs: Repeated verification cycles due to instability.
  • Wasted Resources: Lost time and materials during design correction.

In Lean TPS, prevention begins with design. Quality must be designed into the product and process, not inspected later.

3. Manufacturing Quality Problems (Internal Failure Costs)

In manufacturing, the cost of defects is magnified by volume. A single unstable process can create hundreds of defective parts before detection.

Common examples include:

  • Scrap: Nonconforming parts that cannot be recovered.
  • Rework: Additional labor and material to fix defects.
  • Line Stoppages: Production downtime caused by abnormalities.
  • 8 Wastes: Overproduction, waiting, transportation, excess motion, inventory, overprocessing, defects, and underutilized people.

When Standardized Work and visual control are missing, quality problems spread quickly across operations. Toyota prevents this through immediate detection and response, supported by Jidoka and Andon systems.

Why Reducing COPQ Matters

Reducing COPQ is not simply a financial activity it is a leadership responsibility. Every hidden cost signals a weakness in process control, training, or communication.

Lean TPS uses COPQ to identify where resources are being lost and how processes can be improved. Eliminating these costs strengthens both customer satisfaction and organizational capability.

Key benefits of addressing COPQ:

  • Improved product reliability and customer confidence.
  • Higher process stability and throughput.
  • Reduced rework and scrap costs.
  • Greater profitability without price increases.

Prevention Through Lean TPS

Prevention is the most cost-effective form of quality control. Lean TPS achieves prevention by embedding quality into every stage of the process:

  1. Design Phase: Applying error-proofing (Poka Yoke) and early quality reviews.
  2. Production Phase: Standardized Work, Jidoka, and visual controls for detection.
  3. Leadership Phase: Gemba-based learning, structured problem-solving, and accountability for maintaining standards.

When organizations invest in training and standardization, they convert hidden losses into long-term gains. Prevention costs are far lower than the expense of correction or failure.

A System to Build Capability

The Cost of Poor Quality framework within the Lean TPS Basic Training Program helps organizations see beyond symptoms. It builds the understanding needed to identify, measure, and prevent losses before they occur.

By managing COPQ, leaders develop the discipline to view quality not as inspection but as a system for learning and improvement.

Introduction Artificial intelligence and humanoid robotics are entering production, logistics, and service environments faster than most organizations are prepared for. Many companies are searching for frameworks to manage this shift, but the structure they need has existed inside Toyota for nearly a century. The Toyota Production System is the only

What Mr. Ohno and Dr. Shingo would think of modern Lean interpretations
A Lean TPS visual showing what Mr. Ohno and Dr. Shingo emphasized: TPS as a complete system based on Jidoka, Kaizen, scientific thinking, and learning by doing.
Lean TPS Jishuken case study visual showing production kaizen results at a Takahama supplier, including 30 percent man-hour reduction and leadership engagement through Lean TPS Basic Training.
A Takahama Jishuken case study showing how supplier performance improved by 30 percent through structured leadership engagement and Lean TPS thinking.
Visual representing the evolution of the Toyota Production System and Lean TPS from Kaizen and Jishuken foundations.
Lean TPS connects Toyota’s industrial legacy to modern continuous improvement through reflection, Jidoka, and leadership development at the Gemba.
Visual showing Toyota leaders Mr. Sadao Nomura, Mr. Seiji Sakata, and Mr. Susumu Toyoda reviewing Lean TPS Basic Training at Toyota BT Raymond.
TPS Basic Thinking continues the tradition of Toyota Production System learning, emphasizing reflection, abnormality response, and waste elimination through structured training.
Visual showing Just In Time and Jidoka pillars from Lean TPS Basic Training with focus on lead time reduction and abnormality response.
Lean TPS Basic Training teaches how Just In Time and Jidoka work together to prevent failure, reduce stagnation, and build capability in people through the Toyota Production System.