Nomura Memo No. 31: The First Step Toward Lean TPS Transformation

Nomura Memo No. 31 handwritten notes on Toyota TPS training and Jishuken progress, dated January 31, 2007.
Nomura Memo No. 31 marked the first step in Toyota BT Raymond’s Lean TPS transformation, establishing leadership-driven improvement through Jishuken and structured problem-solving.

Sustaining real Lean TPS improvement requires more than awareness. It requires disciplined action, structured problem-solving, and a commitment to continuous learning.

Nomura Memo No. 31, written on January 31, 2007, by Mr. Sadao Nomura, represented the first set of TPS improvement recommendations for Toyota BT Raymond in Brantford, Ontario. His guidance translated Toyota’s production philosophy into actionable direction for Brantford’s team.

The memo captured Toyota’s core improvement method—building capability through Jishuken, Genchi Genbutsu, and Kaizen. It became the foundation for transferring TPS knowledge from Toyota’s Japanese leadership to the Canadian plant, guiding its transformation from concept to daily practice.

The Jishuken Framework

The Brantford transformation was driven by Jishuken, Toyota’s self-motivated study and improvement process. This method teaches through experience, where leaders learn TPS by applying it to real problems, not by classroom explanation.

Nomura’s structured approach combined three essential elements:

  • Genchi Genbutsu: Go and see the real situation.
  • Standardization: Stabilize the process before improvement.
  • Kaizen: Solve problems through continuous refinement.

Through Jishuken, Brantford leaders and engineers worked side by side with Toyota mentors to address waste, stabilize flow, and strengthen quality at the source.

Key Improvement Areas

Nomura identified five immediate areas for action, each tied to a core TPS principle.

1. Quality Issues
Defects were detected too late, leading to waste and costly rework.
Countermeasure: Implement Mieruka (visualization) and Genchi Genbutsu to detect abnormalities at the source. Standardize work to prevent recurrence rather than relying on inspection.

2. Supplier Defects
Variation in supplier quality disrupted production and reduced efficiency.
Countermeasure: Introduce defect ranking, root cause analysis, and corrective actions. Improve supplier accountability through standard quality metrics and feedback loops.

3. TPS Training
Training was too slow to reach key areas such as assembly and welding.
Countermeasure: Accelerate TPS Basic Training through direct coaching, on-site learning, and structured improvement cycles. Build a culture of hands-on problem-solving.

4. Material Control
Inefficient inventory handling caused excess motion and uneven flow.
Countermeasure: Implement FIFO lanes, simplify material movement, and balance work sequences. Reduce inventory to reveal problems and improve flow efficiency.

5. Future Plan for Productivity and Quality
A long-term vision was required to sustain improvement.
Countermeasure: Apply PDCA to build a roadmap for continuous improvement. Evaluate the feasibility of major process upgrades and design changes aligned with TPS standards.

The Impact of Nomura’s Guidance

Nomura Memo No. 31 was not an audit report. It was a hands-on improvement plan grounded in Toyota’s leadership principles. The memo reinforced that TPS must be practiced, not studied. Every recommendation linked action to learning.

Brantford’s progress reflected the essence of the Nomura Method—structured observation, rapid experimentation, and reflection. This process developed capability in people while strengthening the production system.

As Nomura emphasized, “TPS training is ongoing. Very good progress. Need to accelerate improvement speed.” His guidance shaped the plant’s approach to daily problem-solving and continuous improvement.

Legacy of Nomura Memo No. 31

The 2007 memo marked the beginning of Brantford’s true TPS journey. It connected Toyota BT Raymond to the broader Toyota Industries Corporation system and reinforced the expectation of Dantotsu Quality—quality better than the best.

By combining leadership learning with structured practice, the memo ensured that TPS principles became part of daily work. The Jishuken teams developed both process stability and human capability, achieving measurable improvements in quality, safety, and productivity.

Nomura’s influence remains foundational to Lean TPS training today. His method demonstrated that sustainable transformation begins not with policy but with disciplined practice, learning by doing, and leadership at the Gemba.

Lean TPS House diagram showing Just In Time, Jidoka, Heijunka, Standardized Work, and Kaizen positioned within the Toyota Production System architecture
This Lean TPS Basic Training visual explains how Kaizen operates within the governed architecture of the Toyota Production System. Just In Time and Jidoka function as structural pillars, Heijunka and Standardized Work provide stability, and Kaizen strengthens the system only when standards and control are in place. The image reinforces
Lean TPS Swiss Cheese Model showing how governance failures propagate from organizational systems to gemba outcomes, and how TPS prevents conflicts that Theory of Constraints resolves downstream.
Theory of Constraints manages conflict after instability forms. Lean TPS prevents conflict through governance of demand, capacity, and Quality before execution begins.
Takahama Line 2 Andon board showing real time production status and Quality control in the Toyota Production System
Dashboards and scorecards increase visibility, but they do not govern work. In Lean TPS, Andon exists to control abnormality in real time by enforcing stop authority, response timing, and leadership obligation to protect Quality.
Lean TPS Disruptive SWOT transforms traditional SWOT from a static listing exercise into a governed leadership system. Through Survey, Prioritize, and Action, it aligns strategic direction with Quality, system stability, and explicit leadership obligation within a Lean TPS governance framework.
Balance scale showing Respect for People and Continuous Improvement grounded in Quality governance within Lean TPS.
In Lean TPS, Respect for People and Continuous Improvement are not independent goals. Both emerge from Quality governance, where leaders define normal work, make abnormality visible, and respond to protect system stability.
Lean TPS shop floor before and after 5S Thinking showing visual stability that enables problem detection and problem solving
5S Thinking is not about making the workplace look clean or impressive. In Lean TPS, it functions as a visual reset that restores the ability to see normal versus abnormal conditions. When the environment is stabilized, problems surface quickly, Quality risks are exposed earlier, and problem solving becomes possible at