Discovering the 8 Wastes: The Starting Point for Every Lean TPS Journey

Lean TPS training visual showing the eight wastes of the Toyota Production System: overproduction, inventory, waiting, motion, transportation, processing, defects, and underutilized people.
The Lean TPS 8 Wastes visual introduces the foundation of improvement. It helps people see waste, understand flow, and recognize the importance of engaging every person in daily Kaizen.

Every Lean TPS journey begins with learning to see waste. Once waste becomes visible, the focus of improvement shifts. Teams stop fixing symptoms and start redesigning systems. Leaders stop chasing efficiency and begin building long-term capability.

During my Lean TPS training in Japan, we did not start with tools or metrics. We started with mindset. The first lesson was to see Muda. Toyota teaches seven traditional types of waste, but we also learned an eighth: the waste of underutilized people. This waste is not about blaming individuals. It is about recognizing when the system fails to use their potential. When that happens, the process cannot improve.

The 8 Wastes of Lean TPS

1. Overproduction
Producing more than needed or producing too early hides problems and creates excess. It disrupts flow and increases cost.

2. Inventory
Stockpiling material, parts, or information hides instability. It increases lead time and prevents problems from surfacing.

3. Waiting
Idle time caused by unbalanced work, missing parts, or delayed machines. Waiting time is often greater than anyone realizes.

4. Motion
Unnecessary movement of people due to poor layout, unclear standards, or missing tools. Motion waste creates fatigue and inconsistency.

5. Transportation
Extra movement of materials or information between locations. It adds cost without adding value and signals broken flow.

6. Processing
Steps that do not add value from the customer’s perspective. Often built into legacy systems or unchecked procedures.

7. Defects and Rework
Errors that require correction or scrap. Each one exposes a gap in Standardized Work, training, or process design.

8. Underutilized People
The most critical waste. It occurs when the system does not support people to use their skill, knowledge, or creativity. This waste limits improvement and weakens culture.

Why Seeing Waste Comes First

Seeing waste is the foundation of improvement. It teaches how to see the system rather than just the output. It creates new questions that expose hidden loss:
Why do we do it this way?
Why is this still accepted?
What is preventing better flow?

The ability to see clearly is what separates Lean TPS from tool-based programs. Once people can see, they can learn to act with purpose. That is when 5S Thinking, Standardized Work, and Kaizen routines become effective.

The Practical Starting Point

This 8 Wastes visual is part of Lean TPS Basic Training. It helps teams identify where value is lost and start meaningful discussions at the Gemba. Many organizations begin improvement with metrics or templates. Toyota begins with people. When people learn to see, they can improve. When structure supports them, improvement holds.

For organizations beginning a Lean TPS transformation, this is where to start. Make waste visible. Discuss it. Link it to real flow. From there, the path to Just-in-Time, Jidoka, and Heijunka becomes clear.

Lean TPS House diagram showing Just In Time, Jidoka, Heijunka, Standardized Work, and Kaizen positioned within the Toyota Production System architecture
This Lean TPS Basic Training visual explains how Kaizen operates within the governed architecture of the Toyota Production System. Just In Time and Jidoka function as structural pillars, Heijunka and Standardized Work provide stability, and Kaizen strengthens the system only when standards and control are in place. The image reinforces
Lean TPS Swiss Cheese Model showing how governance failures propagate from organizational systems to gemba outcomes, and how TPS prevents conflicts that Theory of Constraints resolves downstream.
Theory of Constraints manages conflict after instability forms. Lean TPS prevents conflict through governance of demand, capacity, and Quality before execution begins.
Takahama Line 2 Andon board showing real time production status and Quality control in the Toyota Production System
Dashboards and scorecards increase visibility, but they do not govern work. In Lean TPS, Andon exists to control abnormality in real time by enforcing stop authority, response timing, and leadership obligation to protect Quality.
Lean TPS Disruptive SWOT transforms traditional SWOT from a static listing exercise into a governed leadership system. Through Survey, Prioritize, and Action, it aligns strategic direction with Quality, system stability, and explicit leadership obligation within a Lean TPS governance framework.
Balance scale showing Respect for People and Continuous Improvement grounded in Quality governance within Lean TPS.
In Lean TPS, Respect for People and Continuous Improvement are not independent goals. Both emerge from Quality governance, where leaders define normal work, make abnormality visible, and respond to protect system stability.
Lean TPS shop floor before and after 5S Thinking showing visual stability that enables problem detection and problem solving
5S Thinking is not about making the workplace look clean or impressive. In Lean TPS, it functions as a visual reset that restores the ability to see normal versus abnormal conditions. When the environment is stabilized, problems surface quickly, Quality risks are exposed earlier, and problem solving becomes possible at